7.7 Additional Examples

► |  | The Racket Guide

1 | Welcome to Racket
2 | Racket Essentials
3 | Built-In Datatypes
4 | Expressions and Definitions
5 | Programmer-Defined Datatypes
6 | Modules
7 | Contracts
8 | Input and Output
9 | Regular Expressions
10 | Exceptions and Control
11 | Iterations and Comprehensions
12 | Pattern Matching
13 | Classes and Objects
14 | Units
15 | Reflection and Dynamic Evaluation
16 | Macros
17 | Creating Languages
18 | Concurrency and Synchronization
19 | Performance
20 | Parallelism
21 | Running and Creating Executables
22 | More Libraries
23 | Dialects of Racket and Scheme
24 | Command-Line Tools and Your Editor of Choice
| Bibliography
| Index

▼ | 7 | Contracts

7.1 | Contracts and Boundaries
7.2 | Simple Contracts on Functions
7.3 | Contracts on Functions in General
7.4 | Contracts: A Thorough Example
7.5 | Contracts on Structures
7.6 | Abstract Contracts using #: exists and #: ∃
7.7 | Additional Examples
7.8 | Building New Contracts
7.9 | Gotchas

► | 7.7 | Additional Examples

7.7.1 | A Customer-Manager Component
7.7.2 | A Parameteric (Simple) Stack
7.7.3 | A Dictionary
7.7.4 | A Queue

On this page:

7.7.1`` A Customer-Manager Component
7.7.2`` A Parameteric (Simple) Stack
7.7.3`` A Dictionary
7.7.4`` A Queue

top contents ← prev up next →

#### 7.7`` Additional Examples🔗ℹ

This section illustrates the current state of Racket’s contract implementation with a series of examples from Design by Contract, by Example [Mitchell02].

Mitchell and McKim’s principles for design by contract DbC are derived from the 1970s style algebraic specifications. The overall goal of DbC is to specify the constructors of an algebra in terms of its observers. While we reformulate Mitchell and McKim’s terminology and we use a mostly applicative approach, we retain their terminology of “classes” and “objects”:

- Separate queries from commands.

  A query returns a result but does not change the observable properties of an object. A command changes the visible properties of an object, but does not return a result. In applicative implementation a command typically returns an new object of the same class.

- Separate basic queries from derived queries.

  A derived query returns a result that is computable in terms of basic queries.

- For each derived query, write a post-condition contract that specifies the result in terms of the basic queries.

- For each command, write a post-condition contract that specifies the changes to the observable properties in terms of the basic queries.

- For each query and command, decide on a suitable pre-condition contract.

Each of the following sections corresponds to a chapter in Mitchell and McKim’s book (but not all chapters show up here). We recommend that you read the contracts first (near the end of the first modules), then the implementation (in the first modules), and then the test module (at the end of each section).

Mitchell and McKim use Eiffel as the underlying programming language and employ a conventional imperative programming style. Our long-term goal is to transliterate their examples into applicative Racket, structure-oriented imperative Racket, and Racket’s class system.

Note: To mimic Mitchell and McKim’s informal notion of parametericity (parametric polymorphism), we use first-class contracts. At several places, this use of first-class contracts improves on Mitchell and McKim’s design (see comments in interfaces).

##### 7.7.1`` A Customer-Manager Component🔗ℹ

This first module contains some struct definitions in a separate module in order to better track bugs.

> #lang racket
> ; data definitions
> (define id? symbol?)
> (define id-equal? eq?)
> (define-struct basic-customer (id name address) #:mutable)
> ; interface
> (provide
> (contract-out
> [id? (-> any/c boolean?)]
> [id-equal? (-> id? id? boolean?)]
> [struct basic-customer ((id id?)
> (name string?)
> (address string?))]))
> ; end of interface

This module contains the program that uses the above.

> #lang racket
> (require "1.rkt") ; the module just above
> ; implementation
> ; [listof (list basic-customer? secret-info)]
> (define all '())
> (define (find c)
> (define (has-c-as-key p)
> (id-equal? (basic-customer-id (car p)) c))
> (define x (filter has-c-as-key all))
> (if (pair? x) (car x) x))
> (define (active? c)
> (pair? (find c)))
> (define not-active? (compose not active? basic-customer-id))
> (define count 0)
> (define (get-count) count)
> (define (add c)
> (set! all (cons (list c 'secret) all))
> (set! count (+ count 1)))
> (define (name id)
> (define bc-with-id (find id))
> (basic-customer-name (car bc-with-id)))
> (define (set-name id name)
> (define bc-with-id (find id))
> (set-basic-customer-name! (car bc-with-id) name))
> (define c0 0)
> ; end of implementation
> (provide
> (contract-out
> ; how many customers are in the db?
> [get-count (-> natural-number/c)]
> ; is the customer with this id active?
> [active? (-> id? boolean?)]
> ; what is the name of the customer with this id?
> [name (-> (and/c id? active?) string?)]
> ; change the name of the customer with this id
> [set-name (->i ([id id?] [nn string?])
> [result any/c] ; result contract
> #:post (id nn) (string=? (name id) nn))]
> [add (->i ([bc (and/c basic-customer? not-active?)])
> ; A pre-post condition contract must use
> ; a side-effect to express this contract
> ; via post-conditions
> #:pre () (set! c0 count)
> [result any/c] ; result contract
> #:post () (> count c0))]))

The tests:

> #lang racket
> (require rackunit rackunit/text-ui "1.rkt" "1b.rkt")
> (add (make-basic-customer 'mf "matthias" "brookstone"))
> (add (make-basic-customer 'rf "robby" "beverly hills park"))
> (add (make-basic-customer 'fl "matthew" "pepper clouds town"))
> (add (make-basic-customer 'sk "shriram" "i city"))
> (run-tests
> (test-suite
> "manager"
> (test-equal? "id lookup" "matthias" (name 'mf))
> (test-equal? "count" 4 (get-count))
> (test-true "active?" (active? 'mf))
> (test-false "active? 2" (active? 'kk))
> (test-true "set name" (void? (set-name 'mf "matt")))))

##### 7.7.2`` A Parameteric (Simple) Stack🔗ℹ

> #lang racket
> ; a contract utility
> (define (eq/c x) (lambda (y) (eq? x y)))
> (define-struct stack (list p? eq))
> (define (initialize p? eq) (make-stack '() p? eq))
> (define (push s x)
> (make-stack (cons x (stack-list s)) (stack-p? s) (stack-eq s)))
> (define (item-at s i) (list-ref (reverse (stack-list s)) (- i 1)))
> (define (count s) (length (stack-list s)))
> (define (is-empty? s) (null? (stack-list s)))
> (define not-empty? (compose not is-empty?))
> (define (pop s) (make-stack (cdr (stack-list s))
> (stack-p? s)
> (stack-eq s)))
> (define (top s) (car (stack-list s)))
> (provide
> (contract-out
> ; predicate
> [stack? (-> any/c boolean?)]
> ; primitive queries
> ; how many items are on the stack?
> [count (-> stack? natural-number/c)]
> ; which item is at the given position?
> [item-at
> (->d ([s stack?] [i (and/c positive? (<=/c (count s)))])
> ()
> [result (stack-p? s)])]
> ; derived queries
> ; is the stack empty?
> [is-empty?
> (->d ([s stack?])
> ()
> [result (eq/c (= (count s) 0))])]
> ; which item is at the top of the stack
> [top
> (->d ([s (and/c stack? not-empty?)])
> ()
> [t (stack-p? s)] ; a stack item, t is its name
> #:post-cond
> ([stack-eq s] t (item-at s (count s))))]
> ; creation
> [initialize
> (->d ([p contract?] [s (p p . -> . boolean?)])
> ()
> ; Mitchell and McKim use (= (count s) 0) here to express
> ; the post-condition in terms of a primitive query
> [result (and/c stack? is-empty?)])]
> ; commands
> ; add an item to the top of the stack
> [push
> (->d ([s stack?] [x (stack-p? s)])
> ()
> [sn stack?] ; result kind
> #:post-cond
> (and (= (+ (count s) 1) (count sn))
> ([stack-eq s] x (top sn))))]
> ; remove the item at the top of the stack
> [pop
> (->d ([s (and/c stack? not-empty?)])
> ()
> [sn stack?] ; result kind
> #:post-cond
> (= (- (count s) 1) (count sn)))]))

The tests:

> #lang racket
> (require rackunit rackunit/text-ui "2.rkt")
> (define s0 (initialize (flat-contract integer?) =))
> (define s2 (push (push s0 2) 1))
> (run-tests
> (test-suite
> "stack"
> (test-true
> "empty"
> (is-empty? (initialize (flat-contract integer?) =)))
> (test-true "push" (stack? s2))
> (test-true
> "push exn"
> (with-handlers ([exn:fail:contract? (lambda _ #t)])
> (push (initialize (flat-contract integer?)) 'a)
> #f))
> (test-true "pop" (stack? (pop s2)))
> (test-equal? "top" (top s2) 1)
> (test-equal? "toppop" (top (pop s2)) 2)))

##### 7.7.3`` A Dictionary🔗ℹ

> #lang racket
> ; a shorthand for use below
> (define-syntax ⇒
> (syntax-rules ()
> [(⇒ antecedent consequent) (if antecedent consequent #t)]))
> ; implementation
> (define-struct dictionary (l value? eq?))
> ; the keys should probably be another parameter (exercise)
> (define (initialize p eq) (make-dictionary '() p eq))
> (define (put d k v)
> (make-dictionary (cons (cons k v) (dictionary-l d))
> (dictionary-value? d)
> (dictionary-eq? d)))
> (define (rem d k)
> (make-dictionary
> (let loop ([l (dictionary-l d)])
> (cond
> [(null? l) l]
> [(eq? (caar l) k) (loop (cdr l))]
> [else (cons (car l) (loop (cdr l)))]))
> (dictionary-value? d)
> (dictionary-eq? d)))
> (define (count d) (length (dictionary-l d)))
> (define (value-for d k) (cdr (assq k (dictionary-l d))))
> (define (has? d k) (pair? (assq k (dictionary-l d))))
> (define (not-has? d) (lambda (k) (not (has? d k))))
> ; end of implementation
> ; interface
> (provide
> (contract-out
> ; predicates
> [dictionary? (-> any/c boolean?)]
> ; basic queries
> ; how many items are in the dictionary?
> [count (-> dictionary? natural-number/c)]
> ; does the dictionary define key k?
> [has? (->d ([d dictionary?] [k symbol?])
> ()
> [result boolean?]
> #:post-cond
> ((zero? (count d)) . ⇒ . (not result)))]
> ; what is the value of key k in this dictionary?
> [value-for (->d ([d dictionary?]
> [k (and/c symbol? (lambda (k) (has? d k)))])
> ()
> [result (dictionary-value? d)])]
> ; initialization
> ; post condition: for all k in symbol, (has? d k) is false.
> [initialize (->d ([p contract?] [eq (p p . -> . boolean?)])
> ()
> [result (and/c dictionary? (compose zero? count))])]
> ; commands
> ; Mitchell and McKim say that put shouldn't consume Void (null ptr)
> ; for v. We allow the client to specify a contract for all values
> ; via initialize. We could do the same via a key? parameter
> ; (exercise). add key k with value v to this dictionary
> [put (->d ([d dictionary?]
> [k (and/c symbol? (not-has? d))]
> [v (dictionary-value? d)])
> ()
> [result dictionary?]
> #:post-cond
> (and (has? result k)
> (= (count d) (- (count result) 1))
> ([dictionary-eq? d] (value-for result k) v)))]
> ; remove key k from this dictionary
> [rem (->d ([d dictionary?]
> [k (and/c symbol? (lambda (k) (has? d k)))])
> ()
> [result (and/c dictionary? (lambda (d) ((not-has? d) k)))]
> #:post-cond
> (= (count d) (+ (count result) 1)))]))
> ; end of interface

The tests:

> #lang racket
> (require rackunit rackunit/text-ui "3.rkt")
> (define d0 (initialize (flat-contract integer?) =))
> (define d (put (put (put d0 'a 2) 'b 2) 'c 1))
> (run-tests
> (test-suite
> "dictionaries"
> (test-equal? "value for" 2 (value-for d 'b))
> (test-false "has?" (has? (rem d 'b) 'b))
> (test-equal? "count" 3 (count d))
> (test-case "contract check for put: symbol?"
> (define d0 (initialize (flat-contract integer?) =))
> (check-exn exn:fail:contract? (lambda () (put d0 "a" 2))))))

##### 7.7.4`` A Queue🔗ℹ

> #lang racket
> ; Note: this queue doesn't implement the capacity restriction
> ; of Mitchell and McKim's queue but this is easy to add.
> ; a contract utility
> (define (all-but-last l) (reverse (cdr (reverse l))))
> (define (eq/c x) (lambda (y) (eq? x y)))
> ; implementation
> (define-struct queue (list p? eq))
> (define (initialize p? eq) (make-queue '() p? eq))
> (define items queue-list)
> (define (put q x)
> (make-queue (append (queue-list q) (list x))
> (queue-p? q)
> (queue-eq q)))
> (define (count s) (length (queue-list s)))
> (define (is-empty? s) (null? (queue-list s)))
> (define not-empty? (compose not is-empty?))
> (define (rem s)
> (make-queue (cdr (queue-list s))
> (queue-p? s)
> (queue-eq s)))
> (define (head s) (car (queue-list s)))
> ; interface
> (provide
> (contract-out
> ; predicate
> [queue? (-> any/c boolean?)]
> ; primitive queries
> ; Imagine providing this 'query' for the interface of the module
> ; only. Then in Racket there is no reason to have count or is-empty?
> ; around (other than providing it to clients). After all items is
> ; exactly as cheap as count.
> [items (->d ([q queue?]) () [result (listof (queue-p? q))])]
> ; derived queries
> [count (->d ([q queue?])
> ; We could express this second part of the post
> ; condition even if count were a module "attribute"
> ; in the language of Eiffel; indeed it would use the
> ; exact same syntax (minus the arrow and domain).
> ()
> [result (and/c natural-number/c
> (=/c (length (items q))))])]
> [is-empty? (->d ([q queue?])
> ()
> [result (and/c boolean?
> (eq/c (null? (items q))))])]
> [head (->d ([q (and/c queue? (compose not is-empty?))])
> ()
> [result (and/c (queue-p? q)
> (eq/c (car (items q))))])]
> ; creation
> [initialize (-> contract?
> (contract? contract? . -> . boolean?)
> (and/c queue? (compose null? items)))]
> ; commands
> [put (->d ([oldq queue?] [i (queue-p? oldq)])
> ()
> [result
> (and/c
> queue?
> (lambda (q)
> (define old-items (items oldq))
> (equal? (items q) (append old-items (list i)))))])]
> [rem (->d ([oldq (and/c queue? (compose not is-empty?))])
> ()
> [result
> (and/c queue?
> (lambda (q)
> (equal? (cdr (items oldq)) (items q))))])]))
> ; end of interface

The tests:

> #lang racket
> (require rackunit rackunit/text-ui "5.rkt")
> (define s (put (put (initialize (flat-contract integer?) =) 2) 1))
> (run-tests
> (test-suite
> "queue"
> (test-true
> "empty"
> (is-empty? (initialize (flat-contract integer?) =)))
> (test-true "put" (queue? s))
> (test-equal? "count" 2 (count s))
> (test-true "put exn"
> (with-handlers ([exn:fail:contract? (lambda _ #t)])
> (put (initialize (flat-contract integer?)) 'a)
> #f))
> (test-true "remove" (queue? (rem s)))
> (test-equal? "head" 2 (head s))))

top contents ← prev up next →