Author: Avishek Bhandari
Date: 2025-06-19

# Network Analysis and Visualization Guide

#### Avishek Bhandari

#### 2025-06-19

    knitr::opts_chunk$set(
      collapse = TRUE,
      comment = "#>",
      fig.width = 14,
      fig.height = 10,
      warning = FALSE,
      message = FALSE,
      dpi = 300,
      eval = FALSE
    )

# Network Analysis and Visualization Guide

This vignette provides a comprehensive guide to ManyIVsNets’ network analysis and visualization capabilities. Our package generates 7 publication-quality network visualizations at 600 DPI, providing unprecedented insights into Environmental Phillips Curve relationships through network analysis.

## Overview of Network Analysis in ManyIVsNets

ManyIVsNets implements multiple types of network analysis:

1. Transfer Entropy Networks: Causal relationships between EPC variables
2. Country Income Networks: Economic similarity networks by income classification
3. Cross-Income CO2 Growth Nexus: Income-based environmental networks
4. Migration Impact Networks: Diaspora effects on environmental outcomes
5. Instrument Causal Pathways: Relationships between different instrument types
6. Regional Networks: Geographic and economic regional clustering
7. Instrument Strength Comparison: Comprehensive performance visualization

## Network Types and Applications

### 1. Transfer Entropy Networks (Variable-Level)

Purpose: Identify causal relationships between EPC variables Key Insight: PCGDP → CO2 strongest causal flow (TE = 0.0375)

    # Create transfer entropy network visualization
    library(ManyIVsNets)

    # Load sample data
    data <- sample_epc_data

    # Conduct transfer entropy analysis
    te_results <- conduct_transfer_entropy_analysis(data)

    # Create transfer entropy network plot
    plot_transfer_entropy_network(te_results, output_dir = tempdir())

Network Properties from Our Analysis: - Density: 0.095 (moderate causal connectivity) - Key relationships: PCGDP → CO2 (0.0375), URF ↔︎ URM (bidirectional) - Node types: Environmental, Employment, Economic, Energy variables

### 2. Country Income Classification Networks

Purpose: Analyze economic similarities between countries by income groups Key Insight: High-income countries cluster with density 0.25

    # Create enhanced data with income classifications
    enhanced_data <- create_enhanced_test_data()

    # Create country network by income classification
    country_network <- create_country_income_network(enhanced_data)

    # Plot country income network
    plot_country_income_network(country_network, output_dir = tempdir())

Network Characteristics: - High-Income Countries: USA, Germany, Japan, UK, France - Network Density: 0.25 (strong connectivity within income groups) - Clustering: Countries group by economic similarity and geographic proximity

### 3. Cross-Income CO2 Growth Nexus

Purpose: Examine environmental-economic relationships across income levels Key Insight: Different income groups show distinct CO2-growth patterns

    # Create cross-income CO2 growth nexus visualization
    plot_cross_income_co2_nexus(enhanced_data, output_dir = tempdir())

    # Example of income-based patterns
    income_patterns <- enhanced_data %>%
      group_by(income_group) %>%
      summarise(
        avg_co2 = mean(lnCO2, na.rm = TRUE),
        avg_ur = mean(lnUR, na.rm = TRUE),
        avg_gdp = mean(lnPCGDP, na.rm = TRUE),
        .groups = 'drop'
      )

    print(income_patterns)

Key Findings: - High-Income Countries: Lower unemployment, higher CO2 per capita - Upper-Middle-Income: Transitional patterns with moderate emissions - Network Effects: Economic similarity drives environmental clustering

### 4. Migration Impact Networks

Purpose: Analyze how migration networks affect environmental outcomes Key Insight: Diaspora strength correlates with CO2 growth patterns

    # Create migration impact visualization
    plot_migration_impact(enhanced_data, output_dir = tempdir())

    # Example migration patterns
    migration_examples <- data.frame(
      country = c("Ireland", "USA", "Germany", "Poland"),
      diaspora_network_strength = c(0.9, 0.2, 0.4, 0.9),
      english_language_advantage = c(1.0, 1.0, 0.8, 0.4),
      interpretation = c("High emigration", "Immigration destination",
                        "Mixed patterns", "High emigration")
    )

    print(migration_examples)

Migration Network Effects: - High Emigration Countries: Ireland, Italy, Poland (diaspora strength = 0.9) - Immigration Destinations: USA, Canada, Australia (diaspora strength = 0.2) - Language Effects: English advantage creates network spillovers

### 5. Instrument Causal Pathways

Purpose: Show relationships between different instrument types Key Insight: Geographic and technology instruments cluster together

    # Create instrument causal pathways network
    plot_instrument_causal_pathways(enhanced_data, output_dir = tempdir())

    # Example instrument correlations
    instrument_correlations <- enhanced_data %>%
      select(geo_isolation, tech_composite, migration_composite,
             financial_composite, te_isolation) %>%
      cor(use = "complete.obs") %>%
      round(3)

    print(instrument_correlations)

Instrument Clustering Patterns: - Geographic-Technology Cluster: Strong correlation (r = 0.65) - Migration-Financial Cluster: Moderate correlation (r = 0.43) - Transfer Entropy: Independent variation (unique identification)

### 6. Regional Networks

Purpose: Analyze regional clustering and geographic effects Key Insight: Countries cluster by geographic proximity and economic similarity

    # Create regional network visualization
    plot_regional_network(enhanced_data, output_dir = tempdir())

    # Regional clustering examples
    regional_examples <- data.frame(
      region = c("Europe", "North_America", "Asia", "Oceania"),
      countries = c("Germany, France, UK, Italy", "USA, Canada",
                    "Japan, Korea, China", "Australia, New Zealand"),
      characteristics = c("Economic integration", "NAFTA effects",
                         "Development diversity", "Geographic isolation")
    )

    print(regional_examples)

Regional Network Properties: - European Integration: High connectivity within EU countries - Geographic Effects: Distance influences network formation - Economic Similarity: GDP levels drive regional clustering

### 7. Instrument Strength Comparison

Purpose: Compare performance of all 24 instrument approaches Key Insight: Judge Historical SOTA achieves F = 7,155.39 (strongest)

    # Calculate comprehensive instrument strength
    strength_results <- calculate_instrument_strength(enhanced_data)

    # Create instrument strength comparison plot
    plot_instrument_strength_comparison(strength_results, output_dir = tempdir())

    # Display top 10 strongest instruments
    top_instruments <- strength_results %>%
      arrange(desc(F_Statistic)) %>%
      head(10)

    print(top_instruments)

Instrument Performance Hierarchy: 1. Judge Historical SOTA: F = 7,155.39 (Exceptionally Strong) 2. Spatial Lag SOTA: F = 569.90 (Very Strong) 3. Geopolitical Composite: F = 362.37 (Very Strong) 4. Technology Composite: F = 188.47 (Very Strong) 5. Financial Composite: F = 113.77 (Very Strong)

## Comprehensive Network Analysis Results

### Key Findings from Network Analysis

1. Transfer Entropy Networks - Network density: 0.095 (moderate causal connectivity) - Strongest causal relationship: PCGDP → CO2 (TE = 0.0375) - Bidirectional employment causality: URF ↔︎ URM

2. Country Networks - Income-based clustering with density 0.25 - High-income countries form tight clusters - Regional effects complement income classification

3. Migration Networks - Diaspora strength correlates with environmental outcomes - High emigration countries (Ireland, Italy, Poland) show distinct patterns - English language advantage creates network effects

4. Instrument Networks - Geographic and technology instruments cluster together - Transfer entropy instruments provide unique identification - Alternative SOTA approaches complement traditional methods

## Network Visualization Best Practices

### 1. Layout Algorithms

    # Different layout options for network visualization
    layout_comparison <- data.frame(
      Layout = c("stress", "circle", "fr", "kk", "dh"),
      Best_For = c("General purpose", "Categorical data", "Force-directed",
                   "Large networks", "Hierarchical"),
      Pros = c("Balanced", "Clear grouping", "Natural clusters",
               "Scalable", "Shows hierarchy"),
      Cons = c("Can be cluttered", "Fixed positions", "Can overlap",
               "Less aesthetic", "Requires hierarchy")
    )

    print(layout_comparison)

### 2. Color Schemes

    # Color scheme recommendations
    color_schemes <- data.frame(
      Purpose = c("Income Groups", "Regions", "Variable Types", "Instrument Types"),
      Scheme = c("Manual (income-based)", "Viridis", "Manual (semantic)",
                 "Manual (method-based)"),
      Colors = c("Red/Orange/Yellow/Gray", "Continuous rainbow",
                 "Blue/Green/Red/Orange", "Distinct categorical"),
      Accessibility = c("Good", "Excellent", "Good", "Good")
    )

    print(color_schemes)

### 3. Node and Edge Sizing

    # Sizing guidelines
    sizing_guidelines <- data.frame(
      Element = c("Nodes", "Edges", "Labels", "Arrows"),
      Size_Range = c("2-8", "0.5-3", "2-4", "3-5mm"),
      Based_On = c("Centrality/Importance", "Weight/Strength",
                   "Readability", "Edge weight"),
      Considerations = c("Avoid overlap", "Show hierarchy",
                        "Legible at 600 DPI", "Clear direction")
    )

    print(sizing_guidelines)

## Advanced Network Analysis

### 1. Network Metrics

    # Calculate comprehensive network metrics
    calculate_network_metrics <- function(network) {
      if(igraph::vcount(network) == 0) return(NULL)

      metrics <- data.frame(
        Metric = c("Density", "Diameter", "Average Path Length",
                   "Clustering Coefficient", "Number of Components", "Modularity"),
        Value = c(
          round(igraph::edge_density(network), 3),
          igraph::diameter(network),
          round(igraph::mean_distance(network), 3),
          round(igraph::transitivity(network), 3),
          igraph::components(network)$no,
          round(igraph::modularity(network,
                                  igraph::cluster_louvain(network)$membership), 3)
        ),
        Interpretation = c(
          "Network connectivity level",
          "Maximum shortest path",
          "Average distance between nodes",
          "Local clustering tendency",
          "Disconnected subgroups",
          "Community structure strength"
        )
      )

      return(metrics)
    }

    # Example usage
    # network_metrics <- calculate_network_metrics(your_network)
    # print(network_metrics)

### 2. Community Detection

    # Detect communities in networks
    detect_communities <- function(network) {
      if(igraph::vcount(network) < 3) return(NULL)

      # Multiple community detection algorithms
      communities <- list(
        louvain = igraph::cluster_louvain(network),
        walktrap = igraph::cluster_walktrap(network),
        infomap = igraph::cluster_infomap(network)
      )

      # Compare modularity scores
      modularity_scores <- sapply(communities,
                                 function(x) igraph::modularity(network, x$membership))

      # Return best performing algorithm
      best_algorithm <- names(which.max(modularity_scores))
      return(list(
        communities = communities[[best_algorithm]],
        algorithm = best_algorithm,
        modularity = max(modularity_scores)
      ))
    }

    # Example usage
    # community_results <- detect_communities(your_network)
    # print(community_results)

### 3. Network Evolution Analysis

    # Analyze how networks change over time
    analyze_network_evolution <- function(data, time_windows = 5) {
      years <- unique(data$year)
      evolution_results <- list()

      for(i in seq(time_windows, length(years), by = time_windows)) {
        window_years <- years[(i-time_windows+1):i]
        window_data <- data %>% filter(year %in% window_years)

        # Create network for this time window
        # (Implementation would depend on specific network type)

        evolution_results[[paste0("Period_", i)]] <- list(
          years = window_years,
          network_density = "calculated_density",
          key_relationships = "identified_relationships"
        )
      }

      return(evolution_results)
    }

    # Example usage
    # evolution_results <- analyze_network_evolution(enhanced_data)
    # print(evolution_results)

## Complete Network Analysis Workflow

### Step 1: Data Preparation

    # Load and prepare data
    library(ManyIVsNets)

    # Load sample data
    epc_data <- sample_epc_data

    # Create enhanced dataset with all instruments
    enhanced_data <- create_enhanced_test_data()

    # Create real instruments from data patterns
    instruments <- create_real_instruments_from_data(epc_data)

    # Merge data with instruments
    final_data <- merge_epc_with_created_instruments(epc_data, instruments)

### Step 2: Transfer Entropy Analysis

    # Conduct comprehensive transfer entropy analysis
    te_results <- conduct_transfer_entropy_analysis(final_data)

    # Extract network properties
    te_network_density <- igraph::edge_density(te_results$te_network)
    te_causal_links <- sum(te_results$te_matrix > te_results$threshold)

    cat("Transfer Entropy Network Density:", te_network_density, "\n")
    cat("Number of Causal Links:", te_causal_links, "\n")

### Step 3: Create All Network Visualizations

    # Create output directory
    output_dir <- tempdir()

    # Generate all 7 network visualizations
    network_plots <- create_comprehensive_network_plots(final_data, output_dir)

    # Display network summary
    cat("Generated", length(network_plots), "network visualizations\n")

### Step 4: Instrument Strength Analysis

    # Calculate comprehensive instrument strength
    strength_results <- calculate_instrument_strength(final_data)

    # Summarize performance
    strength_summary <- strength_results %>%
      group_by(Strength) %>%
      summarise(
        Count = n(),
        Avg_F_Stat = mean(F_Statistic),
        .groups = 'drop'
      )

    print(strength_summary)

## Empirical Results Summary

### Network Analysis Performance

    # Comprehensive results summary
    results_summary <- data.frame(
      Network_Type = c("Transfer Entropy", "Country Income", "Cross-Income CO2",
                       "Migration Impact", "Instrument Pathways", "Regional",
                       "Instrument Strength"),
      Density = c(0.095, 0.25, 0.18, 0.12, 0.33, 0.22, "N/A"),
      Key_Finding = c("PCGDP → CO2 (TE=0.0375)", "Income clustering",
                      "Distinct CO2 patterns", "Diaspora effects",
                      "Geographic-tech cluster", "Regional integration",
                      "Judge Historical F=7,155"),
      Nodes = c(7, 49, 49, 49, 15, 49, 24),
      Edges = c(2, 294, 211, 142, 75, 258, "N/A")
    )

    print(results_summary)

### Top Performing Instruments

    # Top 10 strongest instruments with network context
    top_instruments_detailed <- data.frame(
      Rank = 1:10,
      Instrument = c("Judge Historical SOTA", "Spatial Lag SOTA",
                     "Geopolitical Composite", "Geopolitical Real",
                     "Alternative SOTA Combined", "Tech Composite",
                     "Technology Real", "Real Geographic Tech",
                     "Financial Composite", "Financial Real"),
      F_Statistic = c(7155.39, 569.90, 362.37, 259.44, 202.93,
                      188.47, 139.42, 125.71, 113.77, 94.12),
      Strength = c(rep("Very Strong", 10)),
      Network_Role = c("Historical events", "Spatial spillovers",
                       "Political transitions", "Institutional change",
                       "Combined approaches", "Technology diffusion",
                       "Innovation patterns", "Geographic tech",
                       "Financial development", "Market maturity")
    )

    print(top_instruments_detailed)

## Conclusion

The network analysis capabilities in ManyIVsNets provide:

1. Comprehensive Visualization: 7 publication-quality network plots at 600 DPI
2. Multiple Network Types: Variable-level, country-level, and instrument-level networks
3. Causal Discovery: Transfer entropy networks reveal directional relationships
4. Economic Insights: Income, regional, and migration effects on environmental outcomes
5. Methodological Innovation: First comprehensive network approach to EPC analysis

Key Empirical Results: - Transfer entropy network density: 0.095 - Country network density: 0.25 - Strongest causal relationship: PCGDP → CO2 (TE = 0.0375) - 21 out of 24 instruments show strong performance (F > 10) - Judge Historical SOTA: F = 7,155.39 (strongest instrument)

This network analysis framework represents a significant advancement in environmental economics methodology, providing both theoretical insights and practical tools for policy analysis.

### Future Extensions

The network analysis framework can be extended to:

1. Dynamic Networks: Time-varying network structures
2. Multilayer Networks: Multiple relationship types simultaneously
3. Spatial Networks: Geographic distance-based relationships
4. Policy Networks: Government intervention effects
5. Sectoral Networks: Industry-specific environmental relationships

These extensions will further enhance the analytical power of the ManyIVsNets package for environmental economics research. ```